Skip to main content

Practical Considerations for Quantitative Gas Analysis with Quadrupole Mass Spectrometers

When comparing quadrupole-based gas analyzers for specific applications, consider two main factors: inlet interface suitability and quadrupole mass analyzer performance. Manufacturers often provide inconsistent or incomplete specifications, making it challenging to assess which analyzer is best for reliable and repeatable quantitative gas analysis.

The inlet and interface design ensures the gas analyzer captures, conditions, and transfers the sample without altering it. This ensures accurate measurements across timescales, from milliseconds to hours, through proper upstream transfer elements and downstream pumping components.

Once the inlet and interface are optimized, the quadrupole mass spectrometer becomes the key component, determining the analyzer’s precision, stability, and detection limits. This includes factors like ionization method, transmission characteristics, and electronic performance.

To clarify these differences, we compare two types of quadrupole analyzers: a 6mm rod diameter RGA-type instrument (e.g., MAX300-CAT) and a higher-performance 19mm rod diameter model (e.g., MAX300-LG). By isolating the mass spectrometer’s performance under identical conditions, we highlight practical differences in precision, stability, and detection limits, helping users make informed decisions.

Key Factors to Consider:

  • Detection Limit: While detection limits can be misleading, they provide insight into the analyzer’s capabilities.
  • Speed of Analysis: Faster speeds are crucial for applications like catalysis or breath measurement, requiring millisecond-level accuracy.
  • Analysis Precision: Repeatability improves with slower scan speeds and more scan averaging, enhancing data reliability.
  • Analysis Stability: Stability ensures consistent results over time, minimizing calibration needs and boosting long-term reliability.
  • Dynamic Range: A broad dynamic range is essential for monitoring gases at both high and low concentrations.

The MAX300-CAT, with 6mm quadrupole rods, achieves detection limits of around 5 ppb at slow scan speeds, while the MAX300-LG, using 19mm rods, reaches <1 ppb at slower speeds, with detection limits of <10 ppb at faster scan rates. The MAX300-LG also offers superior precision and stability, making it ideal for demanding applications.